I usually start my astrological lectures with a version of “everything you know about astrology is wrong.” That also applies to magic to some extent, especially magic which uses astrology as a key mechanism.
My friend John Michael Greer says that Eliphas Levi revolutionized magic by distilling it down to two principles; Will and imagination, together bending the universe into submission.
The problem with this is that he almost completely pulled this out of his ass. Levi was much more of a theorist than a practitioner, and there’s no proof (or even earnest claim) that he performed more than four spells/rituals/incantations in his entire life.
That’s not to bash him. He was a genius. But he invented what I call Victorian Magic, which is what most of you practice today. Its main tools are gestures, visualization, and sonorous gibberish.
In spite of its relative newness, it does some really cool stuff and I use some of it every day. But it’s not what the ancients called magic.
It may be what the ancients added to magic to help it work a little better, like MSG in take out Chinese food.
There’s a thing in Agrippa (if I am not mistaken) which says that magic is helped and hindered by the mindset of the magician. That downgrades the role of the magician’s internal states enormously.
In Scholastic Image Magic, magic does not come from within.
Did you ever see that movie Willow? With the little person actor discovering (spoilers) that the finger which was most magical was his own? And it was a great revelation?
Well, Scholastic Image Magic is the total opposite of that. It’s a great big fuck-you to the notion of magic promoted by DisneyCorp, as a metaphor for imagination and wishing. Because imagination and wishing can only get you so far. “If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.”
Scholastic Image Magic operates on a very basic truism. Humans are pretty damn weak sauce. We are unique in the hierarchy of spirits in that we inhabit ambulatory matter, but that kind of makes us freaks. Though there are some big footnotes and exceptions here, even the greatest of magicians is still basically just a weird monkey with a knack for deforestation. In the hierarchy of living things, we’re somewhere in between God and e.coli– and probably a lot closer to the latter.
The universe is full of power. People are mostly full of seawater.
In order for us to overcome our incredibly limited nature we need to obtain help from outside ourselves. Even moreso, help from beings higher on the cosmic ladder than us. Help from our peers won’t allow us to go beyond our limitations in any meaningful way, because they share our weaknesses. Beings beneath us may occasionally come in handy, but there’s a risk of getting dragged down. (Please immediately refer to Aesop’s Fable about the scorpion and the frog, and apply this to all instances of demonic evocation.)
Nevertheless, using metaphysical semaphores (which is what I jokingly refer to the LVX gestures of the Golden Dawn) or the pentagram rituals, or the hexagram rituals, the intonation and vibration of YHVH or M.I.C.K.E.Y M.O.U.S.E. or whatever, is at best a bit of flourish and filigree in Scholastic Image Magic and astrological petitions.
You’re welcome to do it, but if you’re like me you’ll recognize it’s a waste of effort and discard it in favor of the many many other things you should be focusing on when creating talismans, making petitions, or even electing.
Scholastic Image Magic is much more physical than Victorian Magic. Words are important in petitions, inscriptions, statements of intent; but it’s even theoretically possible to have entirely mute rituals, and have talismans created by some sort of machine and remove the human element almost entirely from the system.
(It probably impairs a talisman to create one silently or without any visualized intent, but it still would be a real talisman and it would definitely work. Considering that elections are often at 4am, I’ve definitely made quite a few talismans on autopilot that worked very well.)
The fact that astrological talismans by way of SIM are so material by emphasis is an advantage. Because it appears to be connected to the fact that when you need to use one, it doesn’t care whether you’re asleep or in a state of panic or unaware of the movements of the stock market; it’s always looking out for you, calmly doing its job.
Getting you out of the equation is sometimes the best thing. You are not such hot shit.
After all, you’re a weird monkey living on a speck of dirt in a very big universe. In order to get superpowers, you’re going to have to do things which are very un-monkey-like.
A monkey can gesture wildly and hoot. Calculating time, using symbols, making tools, and asking for help from more advanced beings is beyond the scope of lesser lifeforms.
This is how you become a magician. This is how you get real superpowers.
(At least, in Scholastic Image Magic.)
4 thoughts on “The Vast Power Within You Is Mostly Crap”
I agree with about 75% of this, and I’ll toss in from personal experience that when I moved from GD style magic over to systems that facilitated direct contact between practitioners and living deities, the difference between the two was essentially the difference between play-acting and doing.
My only caveat here is that I’d say humans do have the potential to develop real personal power through energetic development. (Which in practice largely means developing the energetic capacity of the spine and those channels linked to it.) It’s a slow process, to be sure, and I doubt any human is going to be able to draw and hold enough divine power in their bodies to directly shape the planet in the way that the cosmic forces can, but yogis and others who have developed themselves this way certainly do radiate a palpable power field.
I agree… which is why I used the word “mostly.”
LOL. Fair enough.
After years and years of practice with Asian Inner Alchemy methods this is an interesting contrast. In that context humans are not powerful by default, but through practice and self cultivation they can become quite powerful. Deities and other beings become almost besides the point. Not that one can duplicate all or some of their abilities, but it becomes kind of moot after a while.
Interesting interesting. Power is not innate. Some of my teachers don’t even believe that it’s possible for some people at all. But with a little bit of elbow grease, as it were it’s not impossible.